JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 6, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Procurador General De La Nacion

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Apertura De Incidente De Impacto Fiscal
  • Rechazar solicitud por falta de competencia
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

El Jefe del Ministerio Público solicitó a la Corte Constitucional la apertura de incidente de impacto social contra la sentencia T-066/15, a efectos de decidir si es procedente modular, modificar o diferir los efectos de la misma, con el objeto de evitar posibles alteraciones a la sostenibilidad fiscal.

Luego de analizar la petición, la Sala Plena decide RECHAZARLA DE PLANO.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR el incidente de impacto fiscal presentado por el Procurador General de la Nacion, mediante escrito del 9 de abril de 2015.
  2. Segundo. OTORGAR un termino de tres (3) dias contados a partir de la fecha de notificacion de la presente providencia, para que el Procurador General de la Nacion, si lo estima pertinente, presente recurso de reposicion contra la presente providencia, en los terminos del articulo 7o de la Ley 1695 de 2013.
  3. Notifiquese, publiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
DissentJorge Ignacio Pretelt ChaljubDissentGloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.